There are two issues that were brought up at the HOA meeting
with ICE and CCA that should be discussed. The first is taxes. CCA should
contribute their fair share of property taxes, a good portion that would go to
our local schools. CCA says they fully expect to pay their
obligation of taxes once the facility is up and operational. Our research has shown that if past dictates
present, CCA will use one or more means of tax avoidance to get out of this
obligation.
One example is where they’ve used real estate tax shelters,
until they became a hindrance to their growth. Another time, in 2002, the
federal government sued CCA for $54 million after they discovered CCA was using
tax loopholes to avoid paying federal taxes. In another example, in Cleveland,
Ohio, the city and county gave CCA more than a 50% tax abatement for 3 years,
but that wasn’t enough for CCA, they wanted more ; the county said no and CCA
pulled out of the contract because they didn’t want to pay their share of local
taxes. At a facility in KS CCA paid
their taxes under protest, arguing that 90% of the prison should be
reclassified as residential.