Pages

The Town of Southwest Ranches, Corrections Corporation of American (CCA), and DHS / ICE want to build one of the largest immigration detention centers in the nation within walking distance of thousands of homes; thus, reducing the quality of our life and our community. We do not agree with the federal government privatizing our immigration detention centers throughout the nation when there is clear evidence that privatizing our prisons creates a clear public safety threat. For ICE to continue to privatize these institutions and bring this safety threat through their "secure communities Initiative" to our community is unacceptable. Depriving someone of their liberty is a non-delegable governmental function and privatizing of such a function is infecting our nation like a virus.

The Town of Southwest Ranches has now entered into it's THIRD Fire Contract within the last year now with the Town of Davie, costing taxpayers $120,000 in ramp up fees. They are now closing several roads in western Southwest Ranches charging the tax payers $80,000 for the gates. They have paid an unknown amount of money for lobbying with ICE regarding this prison. They have several lawsuits against the Town, 1- Involving Open Meeting Violations on a November 5th meeting concerning the ICE Detention Center, 2- Open Records Violations, and 3- The Town is putting together a lawsuit to sue Pembroke Pines for breach of contract because the City utilized their exit clause and cancelled for convenience their Fire/EMS contract which included water and sewer at the last minute for the CCA prison. In the contract it states that there should be no third party beneficiaries. CCA would be a third party in this instance.

CCA has also filed suit in Federal court against the City of Pembroke Pines saying they are denying them water however the City had never seen a water application. The City did file for a Declaratory Judgement in State Court but that has been put on hold until the Federal Court hears the suit from CCA.

Is ANYONE CONFUSED as to why the Pembroke Pines/Southwest Ranches Fire Agreement was cancelled? The Town Attorney Keith Poliakoff attempted to "slip" into the agreement a portion that guaranteed water for the prison at CCA's request. This is something that should have been brought up separately. CCA should have brought it forward on their own in a water application. This is sleight of hand that CCA and the Town attempted to do because they were so afraid of CCA being on the Pembroke Pines agenda.

As of June 2012, ICE put out a statement that the site selection was no longer needed due to the fact that the extra bedspace was no longer needed.
READ UPDATE HERE!


Showing posts with label jeff nelson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jeff nelson. Show all posts

Monday, March 11, 2013

Protected First Amendment Rights Confirmed by FEC!

Sorry we've been away for a while.  We know you've missed our witty posts...

We thought we'd bring you some recent information that we received from the Florida Elections Commission by way of a letter regarding a complaint against our PAC that was alleged by Mary Gay Chaples.  It would appear that Ms. Chaples is not a fan of our First Amendment Rights as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.  It does, however, fall in line with the Town Attorney's continued obstruction of Free Speech.  This is a common theme we are seeing with the Town of Southwest Ranches.


Also, it's worth noting that the complaint was notarized by Becker Poliakoff who represents the Town and was strongly supportive of Mayor Jeff Nelson's successful reelection bid.  Don't believe us, look at the Notary stamp and the registration address with the State of Florida.  You'll notice that it's the same address as the law firm of Becker & Poliakoff. 



 
 
 



The lines of ethics are blurred and not by the resident's group opposing the corruption and the prison....

Stay tuned as apparently the prison has new legs...  The Mayor and the Town attorney are apparently trying to "unring" the bell of taking themselves out of the running for the ICE prison to prop up their frivolous lawsuit against Pembroke Pines. Official FOIA requests prove the Town withdrew itself. (Page 7, Second paragraph)

How many people did Jeff Nelson tell during his campaign for reelection that he made the call to ICE to withdraw the Town from the Prison??  For the Town Manager Andy Berns to now flip-flop all of a sudden is just another legal maneuver to try and convince a Judge that they have any grounds at all to sue Pembroke Pines.  Now they think with the sequester happening, ICE is going to follow through with a new detention center??  Not gonna happen!! 

(Page 7, Second Paragraph)

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Town Attorney pushes Code changes help CCA

We got more and more curious since our recent Plat Note Delegation Request Rigged article and started to go over some more historical footage of the October 2010 Town Council Meetings.  As we reviewed the meetings, it seems Mr. Keith Poliakoff, the Southwest Ranches Town Attorney, is constantly making last minute additions to the Agenda and pushing the Council to approve things in a rush.  It really makes you wonder, who is running our Town?

During the October 6, 2010 meeting, we observed near the end during the Town Attorney comments that the town clerk stopped taking the minutes.  The subject of CCA was brought up at time stamp 3:32:30 of the meeting.   Mr. Keith Poliakoff said that he met with CCA and that they said there were "unique housing opportunities within the town."  One would be think that they were talking about Section 8 low income housing. Certainly, most residents had never heard of CCA, never mind knew for what the initials stood.  Even when you spell it out -Corrections Corporation of America- unless you're in law enforcement, you wouldn't think they were in the business of prisons.

He goes on to tell the small audience that Council Members Doug McKay and Aster Knight had attended this meeting and hung out in the back of the room, but did not speak; they just "happened to be at the Town Hall".  We wonder if Mayor Nelson was at this meeting, as well, as he seems to sit in on all of the contract negotiations with Town Attorney Keith Poliakoff.   Does this go against sunshine meeting laws?  We'll worry about this later.

He continues to tell the Council that a lot of modifications to the 2005 agreement between CCA and the Town are required.  That the Town would "essentially be requesting a grant from the Federal Government" and that "we'd be bringing in a partner (CCA) who would actually be running our facility."  This portrays it that the Town would actually own the jail.  In addition, he adds that the Town would need to "take the security risk level out of the contract."  The 2005 contract did not allow for maximum security prisoners to be held at the facility in question.  Mr. Keith Poliakoff states that "when it's an illegal alien, they could be there for a multitude of reasons, so we would have to take the security risk out."


He instructs the Town Council, that the "Town had to write to ICE stating that they would be interested in the detention center."  In addition, "Everyone in the Town is going to have to contact Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to tell her we really want this."  It's interesting that he's said this to a near empty room.  So, does the council get to vote on them writing a letter?  No, Mr. Keith Poliakoff went ahead and wrote it for them.  We wonder, should and can that be done by the town attorney without direction from Council Members?

We then viewed the October 20, 2010 meeting.   Again, this item is the last item on the agenda, Item number 11 which changes ULDC (section 55-080) where it discusses "Manufacturing and Industrial District" which Mr. Keith Poliakoff points out, "effects all the penal institutions in the Town." The changes were to delete the limit of beds and increase the square footage allowed. The full text with deletions noted in strike through is shown below taken off the agenda from October 20, 2010 meeting:
055-080 - (H) Penal Institutions and correctional institutions.
                       (1) The minimum distance separation is two thousand five hundred
                             (2,500) feet from any plot in an agricultural or rural district.
                       (2) The maximum size is seven hundred fifty (750) beds and one                              hundred thousand (100,000) square feet of gross floor area.
                       (3) The minimum plot size is twenty (20) acres.
Mr.  Keith Poliakoff then goes on to tell the Council that this change "gets away from the restriction on the beds and the square footage." Again he touts that the Council "would have to approve the site plan anyway," just like he did in the December 2010 meetings and "if it's not approved, it would prohibit us from applying for the ICE proposal."  We have to wonder if this this rigged too?  See Plat Note Delegation Rigged?  Emails dated September 30, 2012 between Sam Poole (CCA's atty), Michell Mellgren (Town Planner) and Keith Poliakoff show that this is being done at the instruction of CCA's attorney Sam Poole.  This email is very interesting as a normal homeowner has to wait an average of 10 months for a permit, yet CCA can come in and request the town code to be changed!!  WOW!

He then discusses the letter he received back from ICE in which it said that they (ICE) would like Southwest Ranches to submit a proposal to them.  We’re not sure, but since when do you reply to an RFP (request for proposal) and they write back a letter inviting you to give them a proposal. Wouldn't that have been what you were doing when you originally responded?  Mr. Keith Poliakoff then asserts his position that "this has to be adopted to make sure that we are in line for the possible GRANT OPPORTUNITY."  A GRANT OPPORTUNITY? Since when is an IGSA (Inter-Governmental Service Agreement) considered a GRANT OPPORTUNITY? Note, that such an important item is the last item on the agenda, that there weren't many people present and that there was NO PUBLIC COMMENT on this item or any real discussion.   It passed UNANIMOUSLY! Nelson, Knight, Fisikelli, McKay and Breitkreuz all voting “YES!”

The Town Attorney’s got more spin than any politician we've seen! Where does the Town attorney end and the Lobbyist begin?  Guess that comes with the territory, when you have a lawyer whose firm also doubles as a lobbying firm for your town. That one way to tweak the situation of the federal government wanting to put one of the largest immigration detention centers in the state (to possibly house the BULK of all the state of Florida's illegal immigrants) and he spins it as a GRANT OPPORTUNITY? We have to wonder if he's practicing as a lobbyist for CCA or as the Town's Attorney?  Where do his loyalties lie? 

With all that we have seen in the October 2010 and subsequent meetings, we have to wonder who exactly is running the town- the elected town council members or the unelected town attorney?  One way to start cleaning house is to vote on Tuesday, November 6, 2012.



Sam Poole RemovingBedLimit&SqFt

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Top Ten Lies of Mayor Jeff Nelson!


We decided to bring a little comedy to you as the elections approach and we reflect on the fight in the Town of Southwest Ranches David Letterman style.....

We're going to highlight some of the big whopping lies that Mayor Jeff Nelson managed to tell everyone during the past year his constituents and their neighbors in Pembroke Pines fought the proposal to let a private prison firm, Corrections Corporation of America, build an Immigration Detention Center on their non-contiguous parcel of land.  Without further adieu we bring you the...

TOP TEN LIES OF MAYOR JEFF NELSON!

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Plat Note Delegation Request Rigged??

More "inaccuracies" discovered at Town Hall...

At the December 15, 2010 meeting under Attorney comments, the Town Attorney Keith Poliakoff brings forward CCA request to increase the plat note on the prison parcel to allow 2200 prisoners from 1500 that the Town Council had originally approved in the 2005 agreement.  This wasn't on the agenda...  the public didn't have any clue it was being brought forward.

More loopholes to allow CCA to keep increasing and increasing the bed count so they get the most amount of profit.  WOW!  Once CCA got that 2005 contract passed, they knew it was just an easy plat note amendment away to keep increasing their profits. We already know from emails sent by Mayor Jeff Nelson that he is keen on getting more and more money for the Town regardless of the ill effects!

Friday, September 7, 2012

Resident Outrage on the Road Closures in Sun Sentinel


End Southwest Ranches blockade
Congratulations to the town of Southwest Ranches and more specifically the town council. For those of us who live in The Trails and Durango Estates in Pembroke Pines, you have closed off all roads leading to Griffin Road. First there was 199th, 202nd, and 205th Avenues, and now the road that we were taking to get to 208th Lane has been blocked. And just so you know, it has a lock and chain on it so no emergency vehicles can pass through there either.

Please don't tell me this is about anything except the detention center that is at the core of this issue. We all know that the detention center was planned and of course behind everyone's back, even the residents in Southwest Ranches. Had you driven up and down 199, 202, or 205 you would have seen signs that said "No Prison" in both Southwest Ranches and Pembroke Pines. How blind could you have been to the people who put you in office? You really wanted a prison in your backyard, well not really in your backyard, more like a prison that you got all the financial benefits from but in Pembroke Pines.

 To the mayor of Southwest Ranches —- that would be you, Jeff Nelson, the assistant principal at Cypress Bay — can you please tell me what lessons you are teaching your students when you do what you do and close the roads to your neighbors? The words that come to mind are isolationist and separatist. Does the Berlin Wall bring back memories of when you were in school, you know that wall they actually tore down not too many years ago? Shame on you.

Danny Zuccari, Pembroke Pines

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/opinion/letters/fl-letters-friday-0907-20120907,0,3481431.story#tugs_story_display

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Who owns Mayor Jeff Nelson??

You can tell alot from campaign reports.  Has anyone ever looked at one?  It basically shows who is supporting a candidate (or their own interests) when they donate to a candidates campaign.  We just had to look at one campaign contribution report to know who is trying to BUY the election in Southwest Ranches.  JEFF NELSON!  He's been a pro-prison advocate not even taking into account the negative impacts it would have on the town nor the financial implications and has this continued mantra with slogans such as "IT'S A DONE DEAL!" and "THEY CAN START BUILDING TOMORROW!"  We all knew better.  No business starts building anything until ALL CONTRACTS ARE SIGNED!   They were merely "pushing dirt."

An interesting tidbit from the last Jeff Nelson mayoral campaign was that he was actually a WALK ON because no one opposed him...  and he has been on the Council a total of 8 and a half years.  Do you believe in term limits?  He obviously doesn't!!  We all know better than to let this reign continue.


When we took a look at Mayor Nelson's campaign reports it was made clear who is pushing their interests.  In typical "Pay to Play" fashion we saw the likes of Leonard Samuels and Sam Poole of Berger Singerman (CCA's lawfirm) as well as other interested parties like Keith Poliakoff his lawfirm Becker & Poliakoff that are so obviously advocating for a lawsuit against Pembroke Pines for the non-existent contract from CCA so they can get more money in FEES.  Then there are the FIVE Bergeron companies listed as giving donations as they were wanting to make sure they get the trash and recycling contracts for the Town. (Sun Bergeron, Bergeron Land Development, Bergeron Sand Rock & Aggregate and Bergeron's Partner Southern Waste Systems) Almost all of the donors are contracts with the town or associates of Becker & Poliakoff and had a grand total of over $15,000.  We found it very interesting that there weren't many donations from THE PEOPLE in Southwest Ranches... We could count them on ONE HAND with one of them being a Becker & Poliakoff partner and founder of Southwest Ranches, Gary Poliakoff.  You can view the actual report for yourself here.

In the end...who do you want running YOUR TOWN?  Becker & Poliakoff, CCA and Bergeron??  Or do you want someone with YOUR interests in mind??  Think about it before you vote!! TAKE BACK OUR TOWN! Jeff Nelson - Campaign Contributions - TR F2-3
TR - Jeff Nelson F3

Monday, August 27, 2012

The Idiots Guide to Profits!

prof·it/ˈpräfit/

Noun:
A financial gain, esp. the difference between the amount earned and the amount spent in buying, operating, or producing something.

It seems that some attorneys recently have had a hard time understanding what the word profit means.  So much so that it's beginning to make us question what they are teaching kids in college nowadays.  We decided to concentrate on this word in today's blog post to give those that don't understand it, a little accounting lesson they must have missed out on while getting their law degree.

We wanted to give everyone a broad range of definitions for the word profit so the could see how it is used in the different worlds in Accounting and Finance.  In the Finance world, profit is the financial return or reward that entrepreneurs aim to achieve to reflect the risk that they take.  The accounting definition is simply the difference between revenue and costs.  Here is the mathematical representation of the equation.


REVENUE - COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) = PROFIT

Why do we feel we need to spend our valuable time explaining this?  Well, it's come to our attention that the Town of Southwest Ranches is pretty sore about not getting the detention center pick and now wish to create even more havoc in our lives by dragging the City of Pembroke Pines and the Town of Southwest Ranches into a lawsuit because they say they lost out on "profits".   At the time of the deal being killed the Town had not presented anyone with any type of contract that delineated any profits but we'll get back to the profits discussion later. 

Mediation has failed over the last several months between the two municipalities and now the Town is coming out GUNS BLAZING!  Who is pulling out the guns?  None other than Town Attorney Keith Poliakoff of Becker & Poliakoff along with CCA's attorneys (AKA "DEEP POCKETS") Sam Poole and Leonard Samuels of Berger Singerman, who will probably say they will fund the lawsuit just to stick it to Pines for not going along with their prison plans.

An interesting quote from Susannah Bryant's Sun Sentinel article,
Southwest Ranches officials accuse Pembroke Pines of breach of contract for reneging on an agreement not to 'interfere'
OK, If we remember correctly the Town cancelled the Roadways Agreement first and all the City of Pembroke Pines did was honor their wishes.  They wanted to cancel it and the City did just that.  Now they want to turn and sue because they honored their wishes?  This enabled the Town to expeditiously close roads in the west side of Southwest Ranches on 199th, 202nd and 205th Streets.  They were SO happy to be able to do this, they were quoted by Doug McKay to be "Happier than Pigs In Slop!", but they wouldn't have been able to do this with this agreement still intact.  In it, was a hidden non-interference clause forbidding the City from interfering with the Town's prison plans thus enabling them to continue to get increase after increase in the bed counts with Pines having it's hands tied behind it's backs unable to speak up for the residents nearby and the schools that were there prior and after this plat became a prison parcel.  SO that's the agreement about the roads and "non-interference." 

Now we turn to the Fire/EMS agreement...  This had the last minute addition that Pines would provide water/sewer to the prison while almost the entire Southwest Ranches is on a well system.  The addition that Mr. Dodge took approximately a WHOLE SIX MINUTES to consider before conceding the water addition in the Fire/EMS agreement to Southwest Ranches.  Also, Jeff Nelson has been quoted many a times as saying that the CCA could just dig a well on many occasions and why would Pembroke Pines not want to get the profits from selling water to CCA for the prison.  ??  Yes, Profits.  Revenue minus Costs.  This agreement was cancelled for convenience (9 months), a provision that the Town agreed to.  This final cancellation completely severs any ties that Pembroke Pines might have had with the prison property.  They were no longer enabling a project that would only have put the community at grave risk.

SO now we are present day where mediation seems to have failed and now the Town Attorney is pushing this along with CCA's attorneys as they were in attendance at the most recent mediation.
They [ICE] don't want controversy," Southwest Ranches Mayor Jeff Nelson said. "They don't want to read about this in the newspaper. -- Sun Sentinel, July 31, 2012
Maybe ICE realized they were dealing with a bunch of amateurs and decided it wasn't a right fit seeing as everything the Town does ends up in some sort of controversy one way or another.  Name an issue: Road Closures, Land Deals, Fire Contract conflicts with Weston, Davie and Pembroke Pines...  ICE must have realized to put a prison in this municipality would bring alot of scrutiny to the project and decided against it.  No one really knows... How would a Judge know what ICE was thinking when they decided to pull the site selection?  Only one person TRULY knows.

In addition to the Town being sore, there has been "posturing" in the press from both the Town Attorney Keith Poliakoff of Becker & Poliakoff and CCA's hired gun, Leonard Samuels of Berger Singerman.  They claim that the Town & CCA has lost out on this huge amount of PROFITS!   Profits that they seem to calculate in some "New Math" that they must have taught in them fancy law degree schools.
Had the detention center come to town, Southwest Ranches was to have been paid $1.6 million a year plus $350,000 in annual property taxes, Poliakoff said.  -- Sun Sentinel, July 31, 2012
In what contract was this stipulated?  That's RIGHT!  There wasn't ever a contract from ICE.  In addition, what was it going to cost the Town to have this prison for increased police, bonding, indemnity, hire new staff to oversee millions of dollars of transactions that were going to be going through the town coffers, etc that would then have to be taken from the prison "income" that would then equal the profits.  Again, this attorney doesn't seem to understand how to calculate profits... We hope he can balance his checkbook, let alone the mounting legal bills he's charging the Town of Southwest Ranches for!  We think the Town needs to take a longer look at who they are hiring to represent them and see if they have had problems in math during their educational background.   Did we mention he just talked the Town Council into voting to sue Pembroke Pines so they can discuss strategy in the shade... once he's gotten this ball rolling it's going to be a tough bell to un-ring in the courts.  Poor Freddy didn't even know what he was voting on as he had to get things clarified for him twice.  KA-CHING for Poliakoff...  Bad News for our Town Budget!!
   
REVENUE - COGS (Cost of Goods Sold)/COST = PROFIT
**Attorney's Cliff Notes on how to calculate PROFITS** 

Do you think Keith Poliakoff is giving the Town bad advice?  Chime in on the discussion HERE!

Friday, August 24, 2012

Letter to the Town Council on Suing Pembroke Pines

Poliakoff's Selective Truths!

Dear Mayor, Council and Administrator:

It is highly disappointing that the five of you recklessly voted to sue Pembroke Pines last night.  This was entirely based on the stated premise that you were doing so purely to recover financial damages allegedly suffered by Pines' alleged interference in your beloved prison.  This is a prison that required YOU to enter into a third party contract with ICE to OWN enforcement and removal so that CCA could exercise THEIR property rights, by the way.  There is NO established jurisprudence in the USA which supports an obligation of a municipality to enter into a third party contract (IGSA) so that a resident may exercise their property rights.  The property rights argument is specious and hollow in light of the NEED for an IGSA that Poliakoff HID from you for months.

You are acting against the more reasoned advice from me, Mr. Falletta and Mr. Hughdahl to strenuously consider Poliakoff's deficient mathematics where he's convinced you all that your damages are $2MM a year.  I cited CCA's own public statements while YOU allowed him to get away with citing a contract that every one of you knew was obsolete.  Even Sam Poole said this was an embarrassing "marketing contract" that would have to be rewritten.  CCA has repeatedly claimed you would receive $400K for beds and $300K for ad valorem per year.

Well, let's do the simple math based on the existing "John Canada Marketing Contract" anyway.  Poliakoff claims that the receipts will be $2MM for the bed fee as well as ad valorem.  However, he's selectively ignoring germane parts of that very contract which says that the town owes CCA a $100k/year "maintenance fee" back which straight away reduces Poliakoff's amount to $1.9MM.  Do you allow your attorney whom we pay dearly for to hoodwink you so easily?

Next, the contract EXPLICITLY states YOUR obligation to help CCA maintain their AG exemption on the property.  This clause effectively eliminates the $350K Poliakoff cited from ad valorem taxes.  This now brings the total revenue potential down to $1.55 MM based on the bogus "marketing contract" that we knew was being rewritten as he stated so multiple times.  It is outrageous that you all lack the critical thinking skills to challenge these lies by Poliakoff.

Next, Poliakoff's $2MM was based on the estimate of FULL occupancy 365 days per year.  This is an inexcusable assumption which is just as much a pipe dream as anything else surrounding this prison.  You have not asked for ANY evidence as to how CCA will maintain 100% occupancy every day of the year.  I would think an 80% occupancy is aggressive.  I'll give you that optimistic assumption though so the $1.55 MM scales down to $1.24MM in lost REVENUE.

Now, let's look at the other side of the lost revenue.  What are the COSTS associated with this revenue?  We were told my Mr. Holligsworth that you are all businessmen and trustworthy.  Thus, you know that NET PROFIT = REVENUE - EXPENSES.  Poliakoff lied to you by omitting even the stated expense in the contract itself.  So, it's clear that you have blindly ignored the expense side of those sparking dollar signs you see in your eyes and your irrational hatred of Pembroke Pines AND of your own residents who oppose this prison.  There's no judge in the world that is going to let you get away with this fuzzy math, even if that judge has worked for Becker Poliakoff one time in his or her life.

No, you do not have the fiscal discipline to keep Poliakoff's spending in check.  You do not have the critical thinking skills necessary to analyze claims nor do you have the ability to listen to your reasoned residents or think through the ramifications of your actions (kids being picked up on Griffin road all due to your actions closing roads as a Christmas gift).  In fact, last night you shut us out of the process going forward and WE RESIDENTS on polar opposite ends of the prison issue are bringing you issues to look at and QUITE FRANKLY A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF POLIAKOFF'S HOODWINKING OF YOU ALL.  Steve, you shut us out in the NAME of openness.  That's an Orwellian perversion.

Steve, you often chide "bad government" and did so last night when you described your outrage at the school bus situation.   The fact is that YOU are government too.  The council's decision making has been based on woefully understudied facts or awareness of consequences.  You all don't even consider that there were expenses associated with Poliakoff's $2MM claim, for example.  You use your power in government to harass residents, break public records law,  and allow the Mayor and Attorney to personally call out residents and besmirch them with lies.  This is classic abuse of power and you are party to it.

Do the right thing.  Stop this enrichment of Becker Poliakoff now.  Our legal bills for our 2200 households are outrageous.

Here's one last challenge to YOUR repeated claim that the town's viability is and always has been dependent on the development of that CCA property.  If that's the case, why would you all hang your hat on a contract that explicitly deprives the School Board of ad valorem receipts through an abuse of an AG exemption?  But, funny, the Mayor announced that there would be an ad valorem roll back this year on the very eve of the defeat of the prison.  Your claims are specious and demonstrably so.  It doesn't make sense to reduce property taxes at the same time you just lost "$2MM a year" from the CCA deal.  Do you ever stop and think about the big picture of what you are saying?

Regards,
Bill Di Scipio

Do you think Keith Poliakoff is giving the Town bad advice?  Chime in on the discussion HERE!

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

School Buses and the Road Closures do not equal SAFETY

We weren't planning on blogging about this, but since we advocate for the community and this issue came up we felt compelled to let everyone know.  Since the road closures went up there has been alot of upset people on both sides, Southwest Ranches AND Pembroke Pines. The Town Council has said that they were closing the roads for "Public Safety" as they voted to close them at an emergency meeting without sufficient notice to the effected residents.  However, now the Broward County School Board has pushed the bus stops to be on a dangerously busy Griffin road.

Janine Stanwood from Local 10 did some coverage on it last night.
http://www.local10.com/news/Gates-keep-school-buses-out-of-Southwest-Ranches/-/1717324/16203062/-/uesd70z/-/index.html
And then John Turchin did another story today after hearing what the Town had to say.
http://www.local10.com/news/Southwest-Ranches-blames-Broward-for-bus-problems/-/1717324/16214212/-/13k8iqiz/-/index.html

What we can't understand is WHY wasn't the Town Council working with the School Board to make this transition painless PRIOR to school starting? They sent a letter... THAT'S GREAT!  But, what are they doing to be proactive for the children in the Community?? Are they THIS out of TOUCH?  This is just a continued "business as usual" of the Town not being IN FRONT of an issue and getting things done for the PEOPLE that live in the Town.  Is the Town just using the School Board bus woes in their favor??  For someone that is an assistant principal (Jeff Nelson), he sure has NO CONNECTION at the School Board for our Town.  Way to put children's safety first Jeff!  Is it going to take someone's kid getting hurt and then a huge lawsuit against the Town before people WAKE UP?!!

You can decide at the Ballot Box in November!  Make sure you are registered to vote!


Monday, August 20, 2012

Jeff Nelson breakin' the law...


Now that the primary is over, our elections are in FULL SWING

Setting a good example and abiding by the rules isn't something you would expect from Beavis and Butthead, however we should expect that from the Mayor of our Town, right?  Well, we aren't getting that from Mayor Nelson.  Not that we're trying to be picky, we feel obligated to point out how Mayor Nelson isn't abiding by the law of our Town.  According to the Town's sign ordinance (law) passed in 2010, campaign signs are NOT ALLOWED to be displayed until 60 day's prior to the election.   Don't take our word for it, download Ordinance 2011-01 for yourself HERE.  (Page 31, Section M-1-e)

It was passed unanimously by the Town Council on October 20, 2010.  Jeff Nelson voted on it, so you would think he had read it, right?  We understand how some people might not remember something they VOTED on, PASSED, and then SIGNED.   So, how could he have missed it in the Candidate Handbook that all candidates were given?  Surely he reviewed the requirements to refresh the old noggin'?

Our best guess is that Jeff Nelson didn't read the candidate rules either since the sign below has been up for the past several weeks.  It makes you wonder what other "rules" he skirts around for his convenience?  Also, if he didn't READ the Ordinance he passed, what other laws or documents has he NOT READ yet voted for?  Moreover, whose counsel is he depending on for the ordinance's contents?  This is worse than using "cliff notes" in high school.  This shows a complete disconnect for an assistant principal and the Mayor of our town to be taking the "easy route" and not doing what he was elected to do.

Maybe you should ask Mayor Nelson why he's "breakin' the law" next time you see him or you can feel free to email him... 


(Picture taken on 8/15/2012) - See Green and White sign to the right of Korn's sign

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The Nelson Vendetta

Do you know any of Jeff Nelson's history with Pembroke Pines?


Let us help you better acquaint you with the Mayor's past dealings with Pembroke Pines.  Jeff Nelson started working for the Pembroke Pines Golf course managing the pro-shop for $15,000/year in September of 1983 shortly after the City purchased the golf course and Nelson was later elevated to managing the entire golf course.   Since 1982, when the City purchased the golf course, it had lost about 2 million dollars during 8 of those years Nelson was in charge.  So, the City decided to privatize the golf course in 1993 giving up municipal management.

Incidentally, his father Charles Nelson was a Pembroke Pines commissioner at the time and voted against the privatization.  Is this vote a surprise... but hey, of course he wouldn't possibly want his son to be out of a job.  If his son Jeff were out of a job, then he might have to move back home !! So, the City offered Jeff a job at another facility.  Jeff turned that down and decided to file a lawsuit against Pembroke Pines, instead.  He won the lawsuit and the Judge awarded him $282,000 for his nine years of service for letting a facility run at a loss creating a 2 million dollar hole.  WOW!  If we all could be so lucky!  But, in all seriousness, any business looking at any sort of loss is going to look at replacing the management.  The fact that he walked away with this hefty sum seems idiotic, but that was the judgement.

We don't know about you, but we think that this shows a pattern.  We believe Jeff Nelson clearly has it out for Pembroke Pines now given he has a history of suing Pines.  In addition to his demonstrated litigiousness he also seems to have established a pattern of not being able to manage money.  Why did the golf course lose so much money and what fault lies with Nelson for this?  Consider the financial decisions he's made FOR Southwest Ranches. These range from the purchasing of parks in the Town which at one point saddled Southwest Ranches with over $30 million in completely unfunded obligations, to possible vicarious land deals with Ira Cor, to Richard Rubin's grant writing with wife Diana Wasserman Rubin, or the Prison plans that were not made so public. Also, he was willing to recklessly increase the prison bed count to get increased profits while it isn't in the best interest of the surrounding schools nor residents who have kids going to those schools.  This really shows poor leadership, poor financial responsibility, and poor judgement.

He even lists his specialty as "School & Education" on his bio on the Town Website.  We don't see where he was using these skills when he said "the school board should have looked at what was zoned for that area"..  when asked about the prison plats close proximity to the newly built West Broward High school.  Perhaps Mr. Nelson should have warned Broward County School Board that they were going to build a state of the art $140 million high school 1.1 miles from an immigration prison.  Is this the man you want to be Mayor of OUR TOWN? Do you want someone that is supported by Lawyers, Lobbyists and Private Prison companies just so they can remain in power of the Town and get more $$?

Feel free to review the following references:
Pines Ordered to pay Ex-Worker Sun Sentinel May 3, 1996
City to appeal decision  - Sun Sentinel May 9, 1996
Jeff Nelson recklessly agrees to increase of bed space from 1500 to 2200!! -
Email between Keith Poliakoff, Sam Poole (CCA Atttorney) and Mayor Jeff Nelson
Cash Cow - Broward-Palm Beach New Times, Bob Norman
Ira Cor FBI Sting - Broward-Palm Beach New Times, Bob Norman
Jeff Nelson's Campaign Contributions



Monday, July 30, 2012

Jeff Nelson... Leadership of Southwest Ranches?

In addition to being the Mayor of Southwest Ranches, Jeff Nelson works at Cypress Bay High School where he is an assistant principal.  Cypress Bay High School is one of the many schools in Broward County.  The Broward County school system is in dire straights from a combined overspending and the decrease in tax receipts from falling home prices.  They have had to lay off teachers and do alot of cutting back on extras and certain enrichment courses in this tough economy. 


Why is this connection so important?  Well, while acting on the Town Council, Jeff Nelson was one of 4 votes approving a deal with the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) in 2005 (Knight Absent/Abstained).  In this deal, it enabled the multi-billion private prison firm to claim an agricultural exemption that cost Broward County School's ALOT of money!  While the agricultural exemption is a legal exemption that many farmers use, in this incidence it clearly shows how developers abuse this exemption by renting cows to place on the property thus avoiding taxes.  The snippet from the contract is below.

Since the private prison firm purchased the property in 1998 and this marketing contract with the Town wasn't approved until 2005, it has been a total of 8 years since the Town Council had their hand in approving this "ag exemption".  So for 8 years, Jeff Nelson was party to helping a multi-billion dollar private prison corporation dodge paying much needed tax dollars for our schools and teachers.  Is this fair??  According to them they are taking a legal tax break and did nothing wrong.  Which legally they did just what the law required them to do.  But is this a justified use of the ag exemption?  News 10's Bob Norman did a great story on the tax evasion/rent a cow from Bergeron here.

Let's calculate how much the schools would have gotten if CCA didn't get the agricultural exemption.

Because of the 2005 CCA-SWR Contract,
Broward County Lost $480,000 ($60,000 x 8 years)

VS. what CCA paid $24,000 ($3,000 x 8 years)
(numbers taken from Bob Norman's report above)

So, from where we are standing, Jeff Nelson was a party to $456,000 being ripped off the students of Broward County by voting for the Town to support this tax exemption.  How can any teacher or school employee support such a fraudulent use of the agricultural exemption??    Over the past 14 years CCA has owned the property, they have used this exemption to avoid paying net $804,000 (60,000 x 14 years - $36,000) total in taxes. 

What kind of leader is this?  We feel actions speak louder that words in this scenario.  Jeff Nelson may be an assistant principal, but he surely showed us who he advocates for with this vote, and it isn't kids nor the community surrounding the prison parcel. 

Do you feel Jeff Nelson should continue to be Mayor of Southwest Ranches??  We will leave you to make up your mind in November.

The entire CCA contract can be downloaded here.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Fleece me, Please!

Ever since its founding in 2000, the Town of Southwest Ranches has been the source of free money for every sort of grifter that has ever passed through south Florida.  Who can forget the Canadians who made it a Family Affair?  Where else can you run the Town, have your wife oversee the finances and have your daughter control access to public records all for $750K per year?!  Possibly only Bell California has a better life for the grifter on the taxpayer's dime. Who could forget the double teaming of the SWR taxpayer by the Wasserman Rubin pair through their "you write grant - I'll vote for it - you get the commission" scheme?  Pure Southwest Ranches.  Pure graft.

The Town of Southwest Ranches being Fleeced Again
(Attention Mr. Breitkreuz, a sheep is part of a rural lifestyle, not a prison)
In a rare instance of fiscal prudence, the Council forced the new Town Administrator, Ken Fields, to resign for giving $40K in raises to support staff at the Town Hall after Ken bent the process to avoid an independent financial review of the proposed raises.  Unfortunately, the Council's worrying about $40K is akin to concerning yourself with a hangnail *on* the severed arm... What kind of reckless spending has been going on to try and bring a mega prison run by the notorious CCA do you suppose has been going on?   Where is the Council's fiscal prudence here?  What about Mayor Nelson?  He's signs every single check the Town writes... to Becker Poliakoff, for example.  $40K is just the tip of the iceberg, Captain Smith.

Did you know that the Town pays for its very own lobbyist who just purely coincidentally happens to work for the condo attorney firm, Becker Poliakoff?  And that the Town Attorney's name is Keith Poliakoff?   And the first Town Attorney and a Town Founder was Gary Poliakoff?  Hey, it's a Family Affair. Doesn't every 7500 person town dedicated to preserving their rural lifestyle have their condo attorney firm running it and supplying lobbyists?  Legal documents recorded with the Clerk of the House show the Town spent approximately $20,000 for lobbying for the CCA prison in 2011.


The lobbying was conducted by the Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart's former Chief of Staff, Omar Franco, who now has a position with the firm Becker & Poliakoff.  He worked very hard to get Congresswoman and Democratic National Committe Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to endorse an enormous federally funded bit of corporate cronism in the form of a DHS/ICE prison.  It is well known that CCA and other private prison firms spend MILLIONS of dollars a year in lobbying grifters politicians for the chance to get these lucrative contracts with the federal government.  If CCA is willing to spend the lobbying coin, WHY did the Town's taxpayers have to pay a DIME on lobbying for this prison?  There is something you might want to ask your representative on the Town Council and see what they have to say about it.

Spending on lobbying is something we're pretty sure they didn't agree to when the council approved the 2005 agreement with CCA and subsequent delegation requests to increase the bed space...  Maybe Prison Inc's lobbying money was well spent ON OUR Town Council, perhaps?  Or maybe the de facto Town Manager's law firm stood to profit handsomely over the contracting and litigation related to the proposed prison.  Maybe?  We are told to always follow the money.  Much of the money leads to Becker & Poliakoff.  Just file a public records request for their invoices to the Town.

By the way, this increase in bed space was touted in emails as giving a greater per diem to the Town by  CCA Attorney Sam Poole showing all their loyalties lie with greater profits instead of with the people the Council was elected to serve.  But, selling out to predatory corporations is really nothing new for Sam Poole and his law firm, Berger Singerman.

An increase in bed space does offer a greater per diem to the Town, but who would benefit mostly from this increase in bed space?  96 to 98% would go to CCA.  Some great deal, hmmm?  What about our hemorrhaging federal budget? It's ALL ultimately funded with your federal tax dollars.  The Feds are bleeding money faster than they can print or borrow it.  What does this show for our economic recovery?  Surely investing more federal tax dollars into the private prison complex is not going to have some magical effect on paying down the deficit nor will the few hundred dollars offer much of a relief in unemployment rates...    Prisons are overhead and not a productive use of capital. 

The money trail for the CCA prison lobbying doesn't stop there.  The Town attorney, Keith Poliakoff has racked up an enormous register of legal fees because of this prison.  Who is paying this bill?  The Town Taxpayers!  Last year, the Mayor approved over $900,000 dollars in attorney expenses!!  Bills, that we are still sifting through.   Below is a comparison of  the two municipalities involved with this prison, Pembroke Pines and SWR,  based on their budgeted numbers.  It is further broken down as a "cost per person" which is commonly used in comparing legal fees amongst municipalities.

                                             Population    Budgeted Atty's Fees      Cost per Person
                      SWR                 7,500                      $335K                          $47.00
                         PP                  154,000                  $855K                            $5.55
** Population was taken from US Census numbers for 2010, Atty Fees were taken from 2011 Budget for both municipalities.

Election day is coming... You have a voice in your vote.  Let it be heard! The time for a change in leadership is now!

Don't just change the leadership in your own municipality but at all levels that were involved in this prison scheme that didn't benefit taxpayers nor the residents living in Southwest Ranches or Pembroke Pines.

The players consist of Senator Bill Nelson (D), Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D), Allen West (R), Marco Rubio (R) (Former B&P Atty with connections to the Blackwater prison scandal) all knew about these plans and all of them ignored their constituents.

Another thing that bothers us is that if the letter of support for the Town's proposal was just a "cursory letter of support" (as Debbie Wasserman Schultz put it in a previous Jimmy Cefalo interview) and if Senator Bill Nelson is a Senator for the entire STATE of Florida, then why wouldn't he have noticed that one of the three sites that had submitted for the project was shutting a prison down and should have rightly gotten this project to fill this gap in their budget.  If we must fund a federal detention center, which it is believed that we don't really need one, then why not put it where people would be losing their jobs?  I guess that would make too much sense for the feds to understand.  Or maybe it adheres to the most basic calculus of all... Follow the money.

In the end, it's just gut churning.  Throw all the bums out from the Nelsons to Wasserman Schultz to Keith Poliakoff.  Kick them all to the curb as Heidi would say.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Friend or Foe? You be the Judge!

In 1998 Ronald Bergeron sold Prison Inc. the land for the proposed prison. Since that time Prison, Inc has been biding their time, waiting for the right client. Prison, Inc. now has a potential client; the Federal Government via their contract for the ICE Detention Center. Prison, Inc. has been diligently working on this silently for 13 years while unsuspecting families bought homes and Broward County built schools in the immediate area adjacent to the prison site.

In this article, we expose the different players who have been working behind the scenes for their own interests, instead of those they represent. These politicians and “leaders” should be protecting the men, women, and children they were elected to serve. They should consider the safety threat of having a prison so close to residential housing, to say nothing of the affect the prison would have on property values. This leaves us no choice but to call these people and entities out.



Mr. Ronald Bergeron, developer extraordinaire, is the owner/operator of Bergeron Land Development. Mr. Bergeron has made quite the name for himself since he has developed quite a bit of Broward County and beyond. He knows where the loopholes are and was a "Founding Father" of Southwest Ranches along with Gary Poliakoff.  According to the Broward County appraisers office Mr. Bergeron sold the property for the prison to Prison, Inc. for approx. $14.8 million back in 1998 with an attached deal for Bergeron Development to get the contract to build the prison. According to the Broward County Tax Appraisers office, the property is currently assessed at $2.6 million.  Do you notice the big inconsistency here?  Why would CCA pay $14.8 million when it's only worth $2.6?  Incidentally, at the time of this transaction, there were already two schools that were built very close to the site in question.

It's estimated that Mr. Bergeron could make $100 - 200 Million dollars from building the immigrant prison. Bergeron Land Development is the developer on all of the plat note changes filed with Broward County. Over the past 20+ years, Mr. Bergeron has been donating large sums of money to those in office on the local, county, state and federal level hedging his bets for gov't contracts.  It is also common knowledge that there was alot of illegal drug trafficking of Cocaine going on in the 70/80's on the I-75 that Bergeron's company built which his two brother's later took the fall for during the investigation.  Would you take campaign funds from these questionable beginnings?

Ron Bergeron is allowed an unlimited amount of time in front of any commission meeting. No one has ever seen him have to fill out a card like the rest of us nor has he had the clock started when he begins to speak. Since he has so generously donated so much money to both the City of Pembroke Pines and to many of the Commissioner's and Town Councilmen campaign fundraisers he should be granted so much free time during the commission meetings right? Do you think they show him any favor? As they discuss the color of his hat he is wearing does this relationship seem to be a bit overly friendly? Watch the November 16th Commission meeting.  Mr. Lonnie Bergeron, Ron’s son, lives in The Trails of Pembroke Pines.  Do you think that he would let anyone know about this sleeping giant?

The now bankrupt development firm TransEastern had purchased the property from Bergeron that Laguna Isles was built on. Laguna Isles is the closest community to the prison site at 4 tenths of a mile. TransEastern had control of the first board in place when Prison, Inc. supposedly held these "private" meetings with the HOA board of directors in Laguna Isles in the 2000‐2001 timeframe. This was in complete violation of Florida Public Meeting Laws.(FS 286). In addition, TransEastern never informed the resident led HOA of these discussions as they were taking the checks to the bank for the 500 homes they sold in Laguna Isles. Was this full disclosure? Does anyone know if they developed communities anywhere else nearby?  I wonder if Mr. Bergeron disclosed during the sale of the land that he intended to sell land to Prison Inc.?

The Prestigious Law Firm of Becker & Poliakoff served as Chapel Trail HOA counsel since they were built. Do you think they would have told the HOAs that they knew about the prison? Is this putting their client as a priority? Could Chapel Trail have a lawsuit against the prestigious Becker & Poliakoff law firm for conflict of interest while representing Chapel Trail?

Over the Years, Century Management (Now NextGen Management) has been the property management firm for Laguna Isles and Chapel Trail. There may be other properties they manage, but these are all that are confirmed at this time. One of the interesting partners in this Property Management firm is Ryan Poliakoff. He is the son of Southwest Ranches Founding Father Attorney Gary Poliakoff and the Brother of the Southwest Ranches Town Attorney and Becker & Poliakoff partner, Keith Poliakoff. Could the communities out west who were managed by the Poliakoff gang be trusted to let the people know there was a prison on the horizon?

Through the years when this prison did get brought up it was only with certain people. One of those people could have been Todd Nelson who has served on the Chapel Trail Master Association for many years until he dropped off the planet during the recent months when he’s never before missed any board elections and no one can reach him. Incidentally he is also a Captain with the Pembroke Pines Fire Department and the brother of Southwest Ranches Mayor Jeff Nelson. Todd Nelson attempted to hush any discussion on the detention center stating it was political but was later called out as being Southwest Ranches Mayor Jeff Nelson’s brother. Was he furthering the Pines agenda for the 14 Fire Fighter jobs that would be servicing the Detention Center? Incidentally, in 2002 he was selected to be the Semi‐annual Fire‐Fighter of the year by the City of Pembroke Pines Commission where he received a plaque and a $500 U.S. Savings Bond.

The Commissioner Angelo Castillo comes across as a pretty nice guy right? Always says he tells the truth? And the Mayor, He says he’s working in the best interest of the City, right? The truth may be better interpreted with their actions. The November 16th, 2011 Pembroke Pines Commission agenda was set to discuss the "9 month canceling for convenience clause" in the Fire/EMS agreement between Pines and Southwest Ranches. This includes Water for the prison. We were set up to believe that all of these issues would be pushed together into a workshop based on Angelo Castillo’s motion to defer. Seconded by Commissioner McClusky. The Commission then expeditiously voted on the motion. Ortis, Yes. Castillo, Yes. McCluskey, Yes. Schechter, Yes. Siple, No. This motion to defer shut down all public comment so there was no way for the People to get up in support of cancelling the contract for convenience.

Incidentally, that pushed the agenda item to a workshop scheduled for December 14th, which is past the deadline for anyone to file papers to run against Mayor Ortis.


Delaying to a workshop could back off potential opponents to his mayoral race and give the appearance that the Mayor and Commissioners are working in the best interests of the City on the issues surrounding the prison. It appeared as though it was a staged event. Staged to preserve Mayor Ortis' seat so no one would feel compelled to run against him even though the FBI is now investigating him for his relationship with ELAN, a landscaping firm that has conveniently been awarded the contract for the City.  Incidently, Mayor Ortis operates a consulting business and has recently had to give up some Broward County clients under the new ethics laws that have gone into effect Jan 2nd, 2012.

Another one of Castillo’s underhanded actions was putting the water items on the agenda for the December 7th Commission Meeting. Wait, weren't we supposed to be discussing these in the Workshop that was supposed to be scheduled December 14th? What is the rush? This workshop is a scam, just like the Advisory Council that he is talking everyone into. Has he been lobbying for the past 6 months through emails to the Pembroke Pines HOA’s to get involved with this advisory council over the prison?

What is this advisory council? It’s something straight out of the CCA bible on siting prisons: the National Institute of Corrections (DOJ) publication entitled An Information Brief Issues in Siting Correctional Facilities published in 1992 which states:
  • Formulation early in the planning process of a community advisory committee with broad-based membership from significant segments of the community;
  • Use of "field visits" whereby community leaders make in-person or video tours of existing facilities, comparable to the one proposed for their area;
  • Opportunities for community and neighborliness leaders to meet with their counterparts from an area where public participation options have been used successfully to site facilities.
We believe this whole time Angelo has been working with Prison, Inc. and Southwest Ranches Town Attorney Keith Poliakoff to push their agenda, disregarding what is in the best interest of City, Town and most importantly of the People he works for and who pay the taxes.

Charles Dodge‐ City Manager of Pembroke Pines. As the City Manager he is in charge of the day‐to‐day management of both the City and the City Charter Schools.  In 2005 Mr. Dodge was instructed by the City Commission to write an objection to the plat note change for the prison stating that they objected to the change since there was nothing in it for the city and it would use Pembroke Pines roads.  In late 2004 SW 199th road was closed and then in June 2005 both SW 202 and SW 205 were closed, both by the Town of Southwest Ranches.

On November 3rd, 2010, the Town of Southwest Ranches passed a resolution to cancel the Roadways and Other Matters agreement with the City of Pembroke Pines. This Roadways Agreement introduces the "non‐interference" clause so that Pembroke Pines is now unable to defend itself while Southwest Ranches is trying to build a jail so close to thousands of homes and over a dozen schools within the area, not one of them being a City Charter school. Currently there are approximately 19,000 school children in the area.

In a memo dated November 19, 2010 the Southwest Ranches Town Manager, the late Charlie Lynn addresses the Pembroke Pines Management Charles Dodge requesting the termination of the Roadways ILA. Charlie Lynn wasn’t managing the town when this agreement was put into place. John Canada was the Town Manager in place at the time of the road closures and then Roadways ILA so he would not be able to understand the importance of such an agreement to be in effect.

This prison could cause a huge drop in home values, and puts our kids dangerously close to a prison population. And to make matters worse, Prison, Inc. has a history of hiring employees who have in some cases been accused of committing worse crimes than some of the detainees. Why wouldn’t Pines want this ILA to be reversed so they could protect the constituents and children? When Mr. Dodge was presented with this opportunity to cancel this Roadways 2005 ILA, the Pines Commissioners and Management looked at it and decided not to act because it would “close roads”. What possible reason could they have not to cancel the contract? People would rather have the roads closed than to have a big prison near their kids and have their property devalued. Southwest Ranches was handing them the opt‐out clause on a silver platter. I find myself asking, “Why would Pines not want to reverse this agreement, unless they had in fact placed it on themselves?”

The Pines Commissioners state there was a significant public safety hazard placed on residents in the area by Southwest Ranches land locking residents and cut off access to the nearest hospital at the time, the Cleveland Clinic. Using public safety as an excuse is dishonest, since it no longer applies. We now have the Memorial Hospital Miramar to the south. Could this have all been a staged event? Could they have had this road blockage put in place in order for the City and Town to enter into such an ILA? Is it possible that instead of protecting their constituents, those commissioners have effectively tied the hands of any current or future city commissioners from having any ability to interfere or oppose the implementation of this prison.

Why would they sign this “Non‐interference” clause? There had to be something in it for Pines. The Fire/EMS contract and water sold to Prison, Inc. Pembroke Pines will collect almost $3.4M in water and sewer connection fees and then $931 thousand per year for the water.  The Fire/EMS contract brings Pembroke Pines the much needed $1.1M in direct revenues.  With the budget shortfalls in the recent years from declining home values and economic slump, they had to get money for their projects and inflated City Management salaries somewhere. Mr. Dodge has recently come under scrutiny for getting both an income from the city and retirement pension that tops $700,000Gross Mismanagement?

Since 2005, Prison, Inc. has courted the Southwest Ranches Town Councilors and the "HOA" Presidents, sending them up to Tennessee to look at their potemkin village all paid for by Prison, Inc. These Prison, Inc. guys are really nice right?? They are so nice to these Town Councilmen they may even have been promised positions at the prison when their tenure is over with the council.
"The mayors of many cities, including Appleton, MN, Eloy, AZ and California City, CA, have found themselves with jobs at the CCA prisons they host."  -- Privateci.org
It's not like the current council will be re‐elected once the people in the town figure out that this prison holds nothing but problems, and causes yet another drain on the town's delicate revenue stream.

It has been proven that this contract will not bring in the dough like it was promised to them in 2005. The Town and Prison, Inc. had to since bring down the per‐diem rate in order to attract the Federal ICE Detention Center placement. Southwest Ranches will now only bring in about half of the originally promised amount. When you add all the fees that Prison, Inc. will most likely stick the town with for any environmental permitting that comes up that wasn't included in the contract, at full capacity it may only generate a mere $100,000 for the town, if that! Which could be diminished further if the town home values plummet and less tax revenue is brought in.

Look at examples of other failed prison sites and you tell me how this would benefit this area? If the town isn't going to benefit, they why sign the contracts?

A legislative panel in Rhode Island is looking into the reasons why a for‐profit prison hasn't been making its payments to the cash‐strapped city of Central Falls.

Taken from Why I Hate CCA Blog:
"Back in 2004, researchers at Washington State University came out with a report
debunking many of these claims. Their report found 'no evidence that prison expansion has stimulated economic growth,' and that bringing private prisons to town actually impedes economic growth. They followed up this report with another that came out late last year, reaffirming the findings of the original report. The researchers found that not only is economic growth hindered by bringing a private prison to town, but 'a negative relationship [exists] between the growth of new prisons and growth in private employment.'"

Another example of Private Prisons not working out, taken from Why I Hate CCA Blog:
"The town of Littlefield, Texas is suffering the repercussions of funding a private prison on a bond venture. The GEO Group cancelled its contract to run the facility in January of last year, and the town has not been able to secure a new contract to bring prisoners in. Because the facility there has sat empty for so long, the bonds used to finance it have dropped in value. So now Littlfield becomes a higher investment risk, meaning future bonds investments will likely cost more. This is another unforeseen consequence of bringing a private prison to town; people get so excited by the prospects of new jobs that they fail to think about what might happen when the private prison company leaves town. So the next time you hear about all the economic benefits that come with a private prison, take that advice with more than a grain of salt."

Specific quotes regarding several for profit prison projects

Additionally, in March 2010 the Southwest Ranches Town Council continues to give themselves away in page 13 of the Miami IGA Proposal where they state they have the “agreement with neighboring municipality”. Whatever could they be referring to? They didn’t have the Fire/EMS agreement with Pembroke Pines settled until June. The only conclusion is that the neighboring municipality, Pembroke Pines is complicit in these plans to tie the cities hands to interfere with the progression of the jail from a size standpoint as well as protect it’s citizens from it being built so close to their homes and the 15,000 school children nearby.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Friend or Foe? You Decide. Who can we trust in all of this?? Ourselves and Neighbors. We can trust that something in this just isn't right and our drive to keep on fighting this injustice!! Why is our Town and City doing this to the People out in Western Broward? The answer is plain and simple. Money. As you can see the pieces of the puzzle fit quite nicely together that the City and Town are not looking out for the People they were elected to serve. Special interests and developers will be the only ones who will benefit from this project. Bergeron who stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars and Prison Inc who will make billions of dollars from our Federal Tax Dollars.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Partial Analysis of Debbie Wasserman Schultz's WIOD Interview

After listening to the Jimmy Cefalo interview of Debbie Wasserman Schultz it's apparent that Debbie has it wrong on many accounts, is perpetuating lying talking points, and sounds like Attorney Keith Poliakoff and Mayor Jeff Nelson.



Before the analysis begins, let's reflect on why the DNC Chairwoman and FL-20 representative is behaving this way supporting her immigrant prison.  She's taken a lot of money from all the parties involved.  They are all cashing in on our misery.  But, Southwest Ranches Town Attorney Keith Poliakoff laid it out best in one of his emails.  He said:
As you probably have seen we have remained incredibly quiet and have been working diligently with our legislative leaders on this matter without pushing the press angle.

As such, I have been fully advised by our DC contacts that we should remain fully quiet on this one and to let our DC Leaders help without sparking a fire that will make it more difficult for them to assist.
So, the motive and the conspiracy are all here on display for us all to see.  Now,  a number of the Congresswoman's quotes are analyzed here for accuracy:
DWS: You know, what I did was wrote a letter... a sort of cursory letter of support because...
She did not write it. It was on Senator Bill Nelson's (D-FL) letterhead and Debbie cosigned it. It did not even come from her office!  The letter was actually written by Southwest Ranches Attorney Keith Poliakoff and SENT to Nelson and Wasserman Schultz for endorsement.  Check the NT blog for the original email containing the letter sent off to them and proving that she's lying.  It's at the bottom of the article.
DWS: Southwest Ranches for many years has been planning on the property already zoned for things like a dump and a MAXIMUM security prison.
The zoning has been for a minimum or medium security prison.  Maximum security is specifically NOT allowed.  Yet ICE requires this as described in their Statement of Objectives. This inconsistency has never been adequately addressed by Debbie (who continues to lie on the issue), ICE, CCA or SWR.
DWS: There have been many many hearings lots of input.
This is patently false which is why Debbie wrote a letter admonishing Mayor Jeff Nelson for a paucity of public information on the prison.  Keith Poliakoff is well noted for gagging his Town's elected officials with a cone of silence and threats that their constituents may even have to register as LOBBYISTS to speak with their Councilmen about the prison.

She then goes on to describe the ICE meeting she set up (even though Pembroke Pines Commissioner Angelo Castillo already began securing this meeting days before).  What she did not tell you is that in clear violation of open meeting laws, residents were barred from entry unless they filled out a card containing their name, address AND position on the prison.  There were people who were threatened with arrest for trying to enter without filling out that card.   She AND General Butterworth should be ashamed for having their names on such a farce.

Further, after review of the public records, the people spoke loudly and clearly.  Of the 333 cards submitted, only 7 cards in total indicated support for the prison.  4 were from SWR.  One was from a Weston resident with the surname Poole.  4 people in SWR came out to support the prison and 1 from Pembroke Pines (who is a Miami Dade Firefighter).  Unreal.  And they are going ahead with the prison.

When an appropriate meeting was held with the public, near 100% unanimous opposition to the building of the prison was expressed.  Does Debbie sound like she got the message or does it sound like she's just aping SWR Attorney Keith Poliakoff's talking points?
DWS: And now I have urged and now it has been done for the Town to create a citizen's advisory council which will be both in Pembroke Pines affected and Southwest Ranches residents too as the facility moves forward give them input and feedback on what they think needs to be addressed.
This is outrageous sham.  What part of WE DON'T WANT A PRISON does this tin-eared politician not understand?  Further, it's NOT made up of we citizens, it's made up of the ELITE.  Not the proverbial 1%, but the 0.01% who are HOA presidents!  None of the opposition to the prison has been included in ANY of these meetings.  This is addressed in the article Announced Advisory Council... Who does it represent?
DWS: ..that many years ago when the town was first incorporated, that property was brought into the Town of Southwest Ranches and it was already zoned for things like a maximum s... there's a prison right next door to the facility...
Debbie, did YOU have anything to do as an elected legislator from the State of Florida for that special dispensation which allowed the town to bring in a non contiguous parcel?  We believe you did.  Your office believes you did as well.  You were an original part of the problem and you still are part of the problem.  Directly.

Again, no zoning of that land has EVER allowed for a maximum security prison to be built.  And the prison next door is a preexisting 700 bed Broward County facility built nearly 40 years ago.  It is not owned nor controlled by the Town.

Would your benefactors at CCA perhaps have their eyes set on taking over that facility too once they get a foothold in West Broward?  We know how you politicians on both sides of the isle are pushing to privatize prisons owned by the people, all over the country.

This is only one minute of her talking. We really can't take any more of her lies, so we will stop here.  She talks down to us and we are her constituents.  She refuses to meet with us personally.  When has a representative refused to meet with her constituents that have issues that are caused directly by that representative? This is unconscionable.  She doesn't care about the children, the women and the men who will be directly affected by this perverse facility going up DIRECTLY in our back yards that SHE supports 100%.

Addendum:

Debbie's defenders and sychophants in the media are doing full damage control for her now.  Check out Channel 10's Roger Lohose's softball report on Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the ICE prison: http://www.local10.com/news/Detention-center-critics-focus-opposition-on-U-S-Rep/-/1717324/4880330/-/view/print/-/oru1kp/-/index.html

Congresswoman, months ago you were given the opportunity to remove your endorsement of the prison.  You have steadfastly refused. You wanted your name on the project? And now you don't? Are we to believe that your's and Senator Nelson's endorsements had no effect on ICE's decision?   Were you born yesterday as you believe we were?