WATCH IMPORTANT VIDEO ABOUT CCA'S ELOY IMMIGRANT PRISON:
The next story shows that the municipality that signed the ICE contract is not immune from lawsuits. SWR puts itself at risk.
http://www.kpho.com/story/16204021/lawsuit-filed-in-guard-attack-at-eloy-detention-center
The most important line from the story is:
The ACLU lawsuit targets CCA, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials and the City of Eloy. It charges that local and federal officials failed to protect Tanya Guzman-Martinez from abusive male staff members at the facility in Eloy, even after being notified about the sexual attack and ongoing harassment by staff and other male detainees.So, to Marygay Chaples, John Eastman, Vince Faletta, and the others who think this will be great for the town...Bone up on your research, neighbors. Do you want to invite these types of lawsuits to the town?
Next, we have statements from our public records requests that CCA will build the facility for 1500 beds and then get Town Council t approve expansion once they get the go ahead for the 1500 beds. Look at this article on the expansion of the Eloy detention center.
http://www.kpho.com/story/15239997/arizona-to-add-private-prison-beds
The first meeting was held Tuesday night in Eloy. So many people showed up that many were forced to stand outside in the heat.A constant theme, isn't it? Not enough space to house the public when meetings are held.... soup de jour for CCA and the small towns they target.
The proposal presented was by Corrections Corporation of America. Many in attendance were CCA employees.
CCA's proposes 4,500 beds in existing prison facilities in Eloy. Right now, those facilities primarily house inmates from California. According to CCA, if their bid is successful, those inmates would be moved to other facilities.
4500 bed facility. Do you think it can't happen here? What's the population of the Ranches? 7200. Put that into perspective Mr. Eastman, Mrs. Chaples and Mr. Faletta. That's what prison town means. Do you really think CCA doesn't have its sights set on the BCI facility and the 4000 bed Broward plat?
Have a great weekend. No matter what they throw at you, do not lose your resolve. Don't let them threaten and bully you into accepting them.
Get more signs on the ground in SWR. If you read this, contact us to get 10 signs which you will then get your neighbors to put up.
Thieves in the east, in Rolling Oaks and around Councilman Breitkreuz's house are stealing our signs because they don't want our voices heard. We are not the 7 town founders, so we have no say in the town. Get signs out. Don't let Eloy happen to us because our town mothers and fathers are so stale that they have no vision of greatness other than being "Prison Town."
A huge thank you to all of the "vocal minority" who have worked so hard, and continue to work, to keep CCA out of our community!
ReplyDeleteFolks should seriously organized to change power at the HOA level.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. it appears HOA presidents are misrepresenting the residents at the CCA and ICE HOA meetings
DeleteIt would seem some HOA presidents are reflecting their personal views and not those of the people they supposedly represent.
ReplyDeleteIt really seems like maybe the HOA presidents have accepted "something" from CCA for their support. How else can any rational person think that a prison would be good for their community?
DeleteAs a HOA Representative on the Citizens Committee I can assure you that not everyone there has swallowed the CCA kool-aid. The members are 50/50 on their stance. The Committee needs reps from all the HOA's invited to be able to obtain first-hand info about CCA's plans. The only thing "offered" to the Committee was a 1-day trip to tour the CCA Houston facility. We are rational representatives of the communities and half of the members stand with our neighbors against the prison.
DeleteMerely attending these meetings undermines the prison opposition. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and CCA have pointed out that CCA, ICE, and SWR are working with the community to address all of your concerns at these meetings. You are negotiating with them and giving them credibility.
DeleteThe first rule in negotiating with a hostile force is that you do not negotiate. You withdraw ambassadors and then you fight.
It is our group's request that all those in attendance stop lending credibility to this farce by boycotting the meetings. They are not public meetings. They are by invitation only. They are not in the spirit of open government.
If you want information, simply call Sam Poole, ICE or Poliakoff and ask them what you want to know.
The most effective things that can be done are to get signs up everywhere, attend SWR council meetings in mass and express opposition, raise money, and take on the task of getting rid of Nelson, Breitkreuz, McKay, Jablonski, Fisikelli and Poliakoff.
Attending farce advisory meetings is simply negotiation by their very own playbook. You need to reread the NIC brief on siting prisons and other controversial facilities. It's here: http://static.nicic.gov/Library/010591.pdf
The key excerpt follows. Notice they say that the advisory meetings should welcome "broadbased" membership? Broadbased includes skeptics such as yourself. You are being manipulated in a well published and articulated plan for overcoming public opposition. You are undermining us.
How can the public be made to feel a part of the decisionmaking process?
The agency should consider adopting a formal siting program to promote public participation.
Common elements of successful siting programs include:
· Forming, early in the planning process, a community advisory committee, with broadbased
membership from influential segments of the community.
· Affording community leaders visits to or video tours of existing facilities comparable to
the one proposed for their area.
· Providing opportunities for community and neighborhood leaders to meet with their
counterparts from areas where public participation options have been used successfully to
site facilities.
· Providing communities with funds for technical assistance to provide additional unbiased
information.
· Limiting the time period for decisionmaking.
· Disseminating information through brief, descriptive written materials, and informational
meetings.
· Mitigating the perceived effects of the facility by offering a compensation package.
Our Federal Government/ICE should NEVER (EVER!) do business with private companies like CCA....ICE has to pull the plug with these for-profit corporations!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDelete